Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2022-04-23 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 9.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 is much better than the vivo X80, with a global score of 93.4 against 74.1. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S22 has a more recent 13 version and vivo X80 has Android 12 version, counting with a lot of extra features and improved performance. Samsung Galaxy S22 is a somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner cellphone than the vivo X80, even when both of them were only released with a couple months difference.
Vivo X80 features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S22. They have a 8 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy S22 features a little sharper display than vivo X80, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller screen, and they both have the same brightness, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a just a bit better pixels count in each display inch.
The Galaxy S22 counts with a greater camera than vivo X80, although it has a tinier sensor capturing lower quality videos and images, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and a back facing camera with a 50 megapixels resolution. The Galaxy S22's storage to install games and applications is very similar to vivo X80's one, both of them have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Vivo X80 counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy S22, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.