Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2022-04-23 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than vivo X80, with a 95.4 score against 74.1. Both devices in this comparison come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version while vivo X80 has Android 12, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features. Despite being the best we compare here, it must be told that it's also a a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little sharper screen than vivo X80, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a little more brightness, a better pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with as much memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as the vivo X80 one, they have equal internal storage.
The vivo X80 has just a little better processing power than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and a 8 GB RAM. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than vivo X80, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity. Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots much better photographs and videos than vivo X80, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.