Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-23 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 has a score of 79.5, which is slightly better than the vivo X80's 74.1 score. Galaxy S7's design is extremely lighter and a little bit thinner than the vivo X80, even though it was released many years before. The vivo X80 has a little faster processor than Galaxy S7, because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy S7 counts with a little bit better looking display than vivo X80, because although it has much lower brightness and a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better pixels count per inch in the screen. The vivo X80 counts with a bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The vivo X80 has a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 50 percent more battery capacity. Vivo X80 captures clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for taking pictures in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor and a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.