Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2022-04-23 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is slightly better than the vivo X80, with a 78.1 score against 74.1. These phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has newer 8.0 Oreo version and vivo X80 has Android 12, providing you some nice extra features and some performance improvements. Samsung Galaxy S7 edge's construction is incredibly lighter and just a bit thinner than the vivo X80, even though it was released many years before.
The vivo X80 counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a lot lesser pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger display. The vivo X80 features a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The vivo X80 features just a bit better performance than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM memory. The vivo X80 features a slightly better camera than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor and a back-facing camera with much more MP.
Vivo X80 has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.