Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-23 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 has a general score of 81.7, which is much better than the vivo X80's 74.1 score. The Galaxy S8 construction is a bit thinner and incredibly lighter than the vivo X80, despite of the fact that it was released 5 years before. Vivo X80 counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy S8, because although it has a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a lot worse display pixels density, it also counts with a larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 features a slightly better memory for games and applications than vivo X80, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Vivo X80 counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X80 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Vivo X80 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy S8, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much larger sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos and a back camera with lot more megapixels. Vivo X80 features a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has a 50% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.