Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-23 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Gold and Gray |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a global score of 81.9, which is much better than vivo X80's score of 74.1. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active's design is notably older, just a little heavier and thicker than vivo X80. The vivo X80 features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a way worse quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen and a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a larger display.
Vivo X80 has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X80 also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with a slightly better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X80, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
Vivo X80 counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The vivo X80 captures a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light images, it also counts with a much larger back camera sensor and a way more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.