| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-04-23 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Black |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 387 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than the vivo X80, having an 80.1 score against 74.1. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version while vivo X80 has Android 12 version. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a much older, a lot heavier and thicker cellphone than the vivo X80.
The vivo X80 features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot lower pixel density and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a much larger display. Vivo X80 features a little better processing power than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X80 also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bigger memory capacity for apps and games than vivo X80, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery life in vivo X80.
The vivo X80 captures a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking photos and videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.