Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-04-23 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Black |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 387 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than vivo X80, with an 81 score against 74.1. Even being the best in this comparison review, it must be told that it's also way older, just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover Pro has an older 11 version and vivo X80 has Android 12 version.
The vivo X80 features a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X80 also has 4 GB more RAM. Vivo X80 features a sharper display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a little inferior pixels number per inch of display, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with more memory capacity to store more apps and games than vivo X80, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. The vivo X80 counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
The vivo X80 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot more MP back-facing camera and a way larger camera sensor shooting way higher quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.