Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-04-23 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is much better than vivo X80, with a score of 88.5 against 74.1. These phones use the same Android 12 operating system. The Galaxy Z Flip is an extremely older phone than vivo X80, but Samsung was able to build it somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter. Galaxy Z Flip has a CPU that is just as good as the processor in vivo X80, both have the same RAM amount and 8 cpu cores.
Vivo X80 features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a just a little worse pixels density and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a bit larger display. The Galaxy Z Flip has much more memory to store more games and applications than vivo X80, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The vivo X80 has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip's camera is just as good as the vivo X80 one, and although the Galaxy Z Flip has a way smaller back-facing camera sensor providing a way worse image quality and a lot lower 12 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, they both have a same size camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.