Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-04-23 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the vivo X80, with a 94.6 score against 74.1. These devices come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version while vivo X80 has Android 12 version. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is somewhat thinner than vivo X80, although it's noticeably heavier and was released around 19 months before.
Vivo X80 has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit superior processing unit than vivo X80, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit better camera than vivo X80, although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and photos and a back facing camera with a way lower 12 mega-pixels resolution, they both have the same aperture. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better storage for applications and games than vivo X80, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a battery life that is very similar to the battery life in vivo X80.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.