Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-23 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 387 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ2 Premium has a general score of 82.2, which is better than the vivo X80's global score of 74.1. Xperia XZ2 Premium's design is a lot older, notably thicker and somewhat heavier than the vivo X80. Xperia XZ2 Premium has a better display than vivo X80, because although it has much lower brightness and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 2160 x 3840 resolution and a way better pixels amount per screen inch.
Xperia XZ2 Premium has a better memory capacity to install games and applications than vivo X80, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 400 GB. Vivo X80 has a bit more powerful CPU than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X80 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium captures a bit better photographs and videos than vivo X80, although it has a way tinier back-facing camera sensor giving a much lower image quality and a lot lower resolution back facing camera, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture. Vivo X80 features greater battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.