Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-04-23 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 387 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is slightly better than the vivo X80, having an 81.1 score against 74.1. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version and vivo X80 has Android 12. Although it's the best we compare here, we must tell that it's also older, a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier.
The vivo X80 counts with a better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels density, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the vivo X80 also counts with a little bit bigger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X80, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Vivo X80 has a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X80 also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with just a bit better battery performance than vivo X80, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots better photos and videos than vivo X80, because although it has a tinier camera sensor and a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and video, it also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.