Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-02-22 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.35 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.75 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Titanium Gray and White | Black and White |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 524 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.51") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 14 Ultra is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having an 84.4 score against 77.8. Both phones in this review use the same Android 14 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect. Even being the best in this review, it must be told that it's also just a bit heavier and way thicker.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a slightly better screen than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, because although it has a little lower count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with more brightness, a larger display and a quite better 2200 x 2480 resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features just a little bit longer battery life than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity against 5000mAh. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have a 50 mega-pixels camera, the same 7680x4320 video quality and the same video frame rates, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.