Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-09-26 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 4000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 14T Pro is slightly better than Google Nexus 6P, having an 84.5 score against 80.3. Xiaomi 14T Pro's construction is much newer than Google Nexus 6P's, although it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. Xiaomi 14T Pro features a much more vibrant display than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a bit worse 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution and a just a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a larger screen.
Xiaomi 14T Pro has a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Google Nexus 6P has a really superior hardware performance than Xiaomi 14T Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi 14T Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a lot bigger back camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality, a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light images and video and a much better 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Xiaomi 14T Pro features a superior battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.