Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-09-26 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 4000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has an overall score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi 14T Pro's 84.5 global score. Despite of the fact the Samsung Galaxy Note9 is incredibly older and a little thicker than Xiaomi 14T Pro, it's body is still a little bit lighter. Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with a better display than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1220 x 2712px and a quite lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
The Galaxy Note9 counts with a much more powerful processor than Xiaomi 14T Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Galaxy Note9 features a little bit more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi 14T Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Xiaomi 14T Pro shoots way better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light images and video, it also counts with a much higher video quality, a lot more mega pixels back facing camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.