Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-09-26 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 4000 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 14T Pro has a score of 84.5, which is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. The Xiaomi 14T Pro design is thicker but a little bit lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, and both of them were released only 6 months apart. Both devices we are comparing here include the same Android 14 OS, so both of them should give all the same operating system features.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a little bit better display than Xiaomi 14T Pro, because although it has a little bit worse count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, a quite more brightness and a bigger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much greater storage for games and applications than Xiaomi 14T Pro, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi 14T Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has more RAM. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi 14T Pro, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro and Xiaomi 14T Pro count with incredibly similar cameras, because although the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light images and video, and they both have the same video definition, the same video frame rate and a same resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.