Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-09-26 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.32 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Lemon Green, Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 4000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 is a little bit better than Xiaomi 14T, having a global score of 87.1 against 83.7. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison, the Galaxy Note9 is a older, a bit heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone than the Xiaomi 14T. Galaxy Note9 features a much greater processing power than Xiaomi 14T, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi 14T features a more vivid display than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels and a bit lower display pixel density, it also counts with a quite larger screen. Galaxy Note9 counts with a little bit better memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi 14T, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi 14T captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing images in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi 14T also counts with a much larger sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a camera in the back with way more mega pixels.
Xiaomi 14T counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Note9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.