Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-10-20 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Iceberg grey and Shadow black | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2022) is a bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, with a global score of 86.6 against 82.9. IPhone SE (2022)'s design is extremely newer, somewhat thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro. The iPhone SE (2022) works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has Android 9.0 Pie operating system.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features a little bit better looking display than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because although it has much lower brightness, it also counts with a little bit higher count of pixels in each inch of screen, a lot bigger display and a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than iPhone SE (2022), because it has 128 GB internal storage.
IPhone SE (2022) has a little better processing power than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and less cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a greater camera than iPhone SE (2022), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same 60 fps video frame rate and a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has a much better resolution camera.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.