Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-20 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Iceberg grey and Shadow black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, having a overall score of 84.5 against 82.9. Even though the iPhone XS Max is older and a little heavier than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, it's body is still somewhat thinner. The iPhone XS Max has a bit better performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores and slower and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Apple iPhone XS Max has a little bit better display than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has more brightness, a just a little more pixels per screen inch, a slightly better 1242 x 2688 resolution and a bit larger display. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has better battery performance than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 26 percent greater battery size. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a better camera than Apple iPhone XS Max, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.