Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Iceberg grey and Shadow black | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is slightly better than the Moto G Stylus, getting an 82.9 score against 79.7. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro's body is just a little bit thinner but a bit heavier than Moto G Stylus, and both of them were only released 6 months apart. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has 9.0 Pie version and Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version, providing you some nice extra features and improved performance.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features just a bit better display than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite higher display density. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
Moto G Stylus has a much greater storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Moto G Stylus also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G Stylus's battery performance is just as good as the battery performance in Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro captures a little bit better photos and videos than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing images and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same sensor size, a back camera with a 48 megapixels resolution and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.