Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Iceberg grey and Shadow black | Black and White |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has an overall score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 global score. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro's construction is a little bit lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it is notably thicker and was released many years before. Both phones in this review include Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version, giving lots of additional features.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features a lot better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, a really brighter screen, a larger display and a quite better display density.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features much more memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has 384 GB more internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality, a larger diafragm aperture for better low light images, a better resolution camera in the back and a much higher video definition.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much longer battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.