Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Iceberg grey and Shadow black | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a general score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than vivo X60 Pro's overall score of 78.8. Although Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is better than vivo X60 Pro, we must highlight that it is also an older, somewhat heavier and thicker cellphone. These phones use Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has 9.0 Pie version and vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version, so it provides the user lots of additional features and performance improvements.
Vivo X60 Pro features a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features just a bit better screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixel count per display inch.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro shoots clearer photos and videos than vivo X60 Pro. Both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a F1.8 aperture, a 48 mega-pixels back camera, the same back camera sensor size and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
The vivo X60 Pro has a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has a 5% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.