Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-03-28 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 403 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, with an 84.7 score against 82.3. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android operating system, and Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has Android 10 operating system. Samsung Galaxy A32 is a a little thicker cellphone than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2, but they weight the same.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a better pixels quantity per inch of screen. Galaxy A32 counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with improved battery life than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A32. Both have the same aperture, a same resolution camera, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.