Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-08 | 2018-09-21 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blasting black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is just a bit better than the Apple iPhone XS Max, having a general score of 90.1 against 84.5. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a newer cellphone than the Apple iPhone XS Max, although it is a bit heavier and incredibly thicker. The iPhone XS Max features a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has 2 less and slower cpu cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Apple iPhone XS Max has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, although it has a quite lower display density, a bit lower resolution of 1242 x 2688px and a little bit smaller screen. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a way better camera than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a same size camera aperture and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a back camera with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a very superior battery life than iPhone XS Max, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3179mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.