Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-08 | 2017-10-19 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blasting black | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an overall score of 90.1, which is better than the Google Pixel 2's overall score of 81.6. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a newer device than the Google Pixel 2, although it's incredibly thicker and notably heavier. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with just a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 2, because it has a little bit higher pixel count per inch in the screen, a much larger screen and a lot higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has much more memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro captures way better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot better resolution camera.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.