Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-08 | 2016-10-20 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blasting black | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is much better than the Google Pixel XL, having a global score of 90.1 against 81.3. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's design is way newer, but somewhat thicker and way heavier than the Google Pixel XL. Google Pixel XL has a display that is just as good as the display in Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although the Google Pixel XL has a little lower 1440 x 2560 resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a little better display pixels density.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a little better processing power than Google Pixel XL, because it has more RAM and a higher number of cores.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a larger aperture, a much better resolution back camera, higher video frame rates and a much larger back camera sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a very superior battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.