Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2014-10-28 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blasting black | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a global score of 90.1, which is better than Motorola Droid Turbo's global score of 76.4. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has the previous 10 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro body is incredibly newer and just a little bit thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo's, but it is also way heavier.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit superior processor than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a brighter screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a little worse resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro takes much better videos and photos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a larger camera aperture for better images and video in low light situations, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a lot more mega pixels camera in the back.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with longer battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.