Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2014-10-28 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blasting black | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an overall score of 90.1, which is better than Motorola DROID Turbo's general score of 77.9. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has older 10 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a noticeably newer and a little bit thinner device than Motorola DROID Turbo, but it is also notably heavier.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a bit faster processor than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and 5 GB more RAM. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, it also counts with a quite better screen pixel density.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a very superior camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has faster 60 fps video frame rates, a much more MP back camera and a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and videos.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has superior battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.