Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2024-08-08 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blasting black | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a score of 90.1, which is better than the Motorola Edge 50's overall score of 81.2. Even being the best we compare here, Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is an extremely older, notably thicker and heavier cellphone than the Motorola Edge 50. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14.
Motorola Edge 50 has a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, although it has a bit lower resolution of 1220 x 2712px, a little smaller screen and a little bit worse number of pixels per inch of screen. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50. Both have 8 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro captures slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a smaller sensor taking worse quality photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a back camera with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro and the Motorola Edge 50 have extremely similar memory for games and applications, both have equal internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50's battery lifetime is just as good as the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.