Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2020-04-16 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blasting black | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 484 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a global score of 90.1, which is better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus's general score of 79.7. Although it's the best we are comparing, we must tell that it's also thicker and heavier. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has the older 10 version while Motorola Moto G Stylus has Android 11.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a little bit larger screen, a little bit better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro shoots a bit better photos and videos than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has superior battery performance than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.