Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2024-04-03 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blasting black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a general score of 90.1, which is better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Even though the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a better phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it must be told that it is also a lot older, just a bit heavier and a lot thicker.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a quite lower amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite larger display and a slightly higher 2200 x 2480px resolution. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way bigger storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because it has 256 GB more internal memory.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a much faster processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots slightly better photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a back camera with a lot worse 50 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and video, a way larger back-facing camera sensor and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.