Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-05-08 | 2016-09-29 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Blasting black | Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Metal |
| -- | $ 345.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 484 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a general score of 90.1, which is better than the Xiaomi Mi 5s's score of 76.4. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an older 10 version and Xiaomi Mi 5s has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro design is notably newer than the Xiaomi Mi 5s's, but it's extremely heavier and noticeably thicker.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores. The Xiaomi Mi 5s counts with just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, although it has a just a little inferior number of pixels per inch in the display, a way smaller display and a way lower resolution of 1080 x 1920.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a way better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has faster video frame rate, a larger aperture to capture better low light captures and videos, a much higher resolution back facing camera and a much bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.