Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a global score of 86.6, which is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 global score. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 design is newer and just a little thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo's, although it's also notably heavier. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has 10 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a brighter screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater display density.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a greater camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and videos, a much more mega-pixels back camera and faster video frame rates.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with better battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4720mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.