Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a global score of 86.6, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus's score of 79.7. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has older 10 version and Motorola Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version. Despite being the best in this review, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 body is heavier and thicker than Motorola Moto G Stylus.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has just a little better performance than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite bigger display.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 takes a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking pictures in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also counts with a bigger sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures, higher video frame rates and a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with improved battery duration than Moto G Stylus, because it has an 18% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.