Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-05-06 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Mirror Black and Pale Grey | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50, with a general score of 88.3 against 81.2. Even though the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is a better cellphone than Motorola Edge 50, it must be told that it's also notably older, somewhat heavier and notably thicker. These devices have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a slightly better resolution of 1220 x 2712, a quite more brightness and a just a bit greater pixels amount in each inch in the screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a bit superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 shoots clearer photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a worse video definition, a back-facing camera with a worse 48 mega pixels resolution and a much smaller sensor providing a way worse image quality, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.