Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android |
| 2021-05-06 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Mirror Black and Pale Grey | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Metal and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 499.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has an overall score of 88.3, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A32's general score of 84.7. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has Android 11 OS, while Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android OS. Although it's the best phone in our current comparison, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 construction is just a little heavier and thicker than Samsung Galaxy A32.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because it has a little bigger display, a way better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a better pixels quantity per display inch. Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A32 counts with much more memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A32 has a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 shoots better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also has better video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.