Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-05-06 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Mirror Black and Pale Grey | Black and White |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| $ 499.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a overall score of 88.3 against 77.8. Even though Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is much older and incredibly thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still a little lighter. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has the previous 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a way better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better display than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has a little greater display density, a bigger screen, way more brightness and a way better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited situations, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a camera in the back with a higher resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.