Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-04 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 has a score of 85, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro's 78.7 general score. The iPhone 8 construction is notably lighter and notably thinner than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 5 years before. IPhone 8 has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, although it has a bit worse pixels amount in each display inch, a much lower 750 x 1334 resolution and a much smaller display.
IPhone 8 features an extremely better CPU than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has less RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has a lot better camera than iPhone 8, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor providing a worse image quality, and they both have the same video frame rates, the same (4K) video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro and iPhone 8 both feature really similar memory for apps and games, they have equal internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro features a much better battery duration than iPhone 8, because it has 4650mAh of battery capacity instead of 1821mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.