Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-04-04 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus is slightly better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, getting a general score of 79.7 against 78.7. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Moto G Stylus has an older 11 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has Android 12. Moto G Stylus is an older phone than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, but Motorola made it somewhat lighter and just a little thinner anyway.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a bit better display than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2300px resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better number of pixels per inch in the screen. Moto G Stylus has a way better performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Moto G Stylus features a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and/or video in poorly lited environments and a way smaller back camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher 108 mega-pixels resolution and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 4650mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.