Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android |
| 2022-04-04 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.65 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a global score of 84.7, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro's 78.7 general score. The Samsung Galaxy A32 construction is a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, even though it was released around 15 months before. Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android OS, while Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has Android 12 OS.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a much better performing processor than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro features a little bit better display than Galaxy A32, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, more pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit larger screen.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro features slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A32, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also has better 60 fps video frame rate and a much higher resolution back camera.
The Galaxy A32 has a bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.