Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-04-20 | 2016-09-16 |
| 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches | 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 969.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 7 Plus is a bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark, getting an 83.8 score against 80.4. The iPhone 7 Plus body is just a little lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Black Shark, even though it was released around a year before. Xiaomi Black Shark has a little better processing power than Apple iPhone 7 Plus, because it has more RAM memory and more CPU cores.
The Apple iPhone 7 Plus has a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, a little bit lower number of pixels per inch of screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a little bit more brightness. The Xiaomi Black Shark counts with a bit better camera than iPhone 7 Plus, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same video frame rate, the same resolution back-facing camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
IPhone 7 Plus counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has more internal storage. The Xiaomi Black Shark counts with a much better battery performance than iPhone 7 Plus, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.