Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android |
| 2018-04-20 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 402 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark, with an 84.7 score against 80.4. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android OS, while Xiaomi Black Shark has Android 9.0 Pie OS. Samsung Galaxy A32 is a just a bit heavier phone than Xiaomi Black Shark, but both have the same thickness.
The Xiaomi Black Shark has a sharper screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a greater count of pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy A32 has much more memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Black Shark counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A32 counts with better battery life than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A32 captures much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.