Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-04-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Black and White |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark has a general score of 80.4, which is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. Xiaomi Black Shark's construction is lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's much thicker and was released 6 years before. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Black Shark has a newer 9.0 Pie version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Xiaomi Black Shark features a much better performing CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better screen than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a much brighter screen, a little more pixels per display inch, a lot bigger screen and a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a way bigger back camera sensor shooting much better quality photos, a bigger aperture for better low light photos and video and a lot more mega-pixels back camera. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a really longer battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a 43% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.