Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-25 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.45 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Aurora Blue, Cosmic Gray and Dream White | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4160mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite has an overall score of 83.6, which is just a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 general score. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite is an older device than OPPO Find X3 Pro, but Xiaomi was able to build it just a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter. Both devices we compare here use Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite has the older 10 version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, because it has a quite bigger display, a better pixel amount per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 3216 resolution.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, because it has more internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a camera in the back with a better 50 megapixels resolution, a much bigger camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4160mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.