Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.6 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-05-25 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.45 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Aurora Blue, Cosmic Gray and Dream White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 399 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4160mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite's overall score of 83.6. Even being the best in our current comparison, the Galaxy A32 construction is just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite. Galaxy A32 has Android OS, and Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite has Android 10 OS.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite features a much better looking display than Galaxy A32, because it has a greater display pixels density, a quite larger display and a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A32 counts with a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A32 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A32. Both of them have the same video frame rates, a 48 mega-pixels back camera, the same (4K) video definition and the same camera aperture.
Galaxy A32 counts with better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4160mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.