Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-13 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.57 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4820mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.64 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max has a score of 84.5, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite's 81.2 overall score. The iPhone XS Max is an way older cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, but it is a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The Apple iPhone XS Max features a much better screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels and a little higher display pixels density.
The Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a better performing CPU than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The Apple iPhone XS Max and Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite both feature incredibly similar storage to store more games and applications, both of them have equal internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite shoots just a bit better photos and videos than iPhone XS Max, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photos and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera and a way bigger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite features a much longer battery performance than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 4820mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.