Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-13 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.57 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4820mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.64 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, having a global score of 81.6 against 81.2. Even though Google Pixel 2 is extremely older than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, it's construction is somewhat thinner and extremely lighter. The Google Pixel 2 features just a bit better display than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixel quantity per inch of screen.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite and the Google Pixel 2 count with really similar processors, and although the Google Pixel 2 has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photos and a camera in the back with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Google Pixel 2 has a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because it has more internal storage. Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4820mAh battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.