Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-13 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.57 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4820mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 has an overall score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite's overall score of 81.2. The Galaxy Note9 design has the same thickness than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, but it is just a little bit lighter. Galaxy Note9 has just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount.
The Galaxy Note9 counts with just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2960px resolution. Galaxy Note9 counts with a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a way smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite also counts with a back facing camera with a much better resolution and a lot bigger sensor taking lot higher quality photographs and videos.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite counts with superior battery performance than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 4820mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.