Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-01 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Cosmic black and Lunar silver | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 650 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has a general score of 90, which is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's score of 77.8. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has the older 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro is a notably older and incredibly thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Xiaomi managed to build it just a little bit lighter anyway.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better display than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, because it has a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480, a much brighter display, a quite greater pixels density and a larger display. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, because it has 384 GB more internal storage.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has a very superior processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a little bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, because it has a 14% bigger battery size. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro shoots a bit better photographs and videos than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera sensor which provides a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.