Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-01 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Lunar silver | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 650 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10T is just a bit better than Apple iPhone XS Max, having an 87.9 score against 84.5. Xiaomi Mi 10T's design is notably newer than Apple iPhone XS Max's, but it is somewhat thicker and just a little bit heavier. The Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little darker screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch and a bit higher 1242 x 2688 resolution.
Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. Xiaomi Mi 10T features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone XS Max, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 10T has a way better battery duration than iPhone XS Max, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3179mAh. The Xiaomi Mi 10T captures much better photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photos, it also counts with a lot better video resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor and a lot higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.